02/05/2010

Further Shakeup in the VSPS Market – Intel acquiring Virtutech

Wind River to add Simics Virtual System Prototyping/Simulation Solution to Portfolio

 

What Happened?

 

Wind River, a wholly owned subsidiary of Intel Corporation (NASDQ: INTC), today announced it will add the Virtutech product line to its embedded software product portfolio after the completion of Intel Corporation’s acquisition of Virtutech which is expected to close later this quarter.  

 

VDC’s View

 

This announcement marks the 2nd major acquisition in the VSPS market this week.  On Wednesday Synopsys announced that it had acquired VaST Systems Technology Corp.  As we stated previously – Synopsys’ acquisition of VaST gave the combined entity the top spot for the VSPS market revenue share.

 

What we did not specifically spell out is who a combined Synopsys/VaST would be leapfrogging…You guessed it – Virtutech.

 

Why all the fuss about a relatively small market segment?

 

It is no secret that the level of functionality required and expected within mobile and embedded devices has skyrocketed in recent years.  Meanwhile, development timelines and time-to-market requirements certainly haven’t eased off.  In fact, many engineering teams are being asked to meet or exceed previous time tables with fewer resources.

 

Not surprisingly, engineering organizations continue to look for ways to speed software development, sometimes through the use of new types of tools and/or methodologies.  Virtual System Prototyping/Simulation (VSPS) solutions, such as those from Virtutech, Synopsys, and CoWare, offer a way for development teams to potentially shorten the entire development process by accelerating the software development tasks to earlier in the overall project’s workflow.

 

So is this the cure-all for embedded software development woes?

 

In short – No.  First off all, as with any new technology, you cannot expect overnight transformation of entrenched development processes.

 

However, our 2009 Embedded Engineering Survey showed a significant increase in the use of VSPS tools over 2008 results (14.1% vs. 8.5% of respondents).  This increase should be viewed in a broader context confirming that engineering teams are adopting new tools (VSPS among others) in greater frequencies as part of comprehensive strategies aimed to revamp embedded system engineering processes in order to adequately and efficiently address the next generation of system requirements and challenges.

 

But is this a fit for Intel/WR and what should we expect going forward?

 

Beyond just the long-standing partnership between Wind River and Virtutech, our research shows that the companies’ business should, from a revenue perspective, map well together with telecommunications and military/aerospace traditionally generating the majority of both companies’ revenue.

 

Need we forget that Wind River is also now owned by a semiconductor company?  If nothing else, we can view this acquisition as confirmation that Intel is seriously serious about not just pursuing the embedded market but actually trying to dominate it.  Even though Wind River has stated that, similar to with its own products, Simics will continue to support other architectures – at the end of the day, Intel is still trying to sell silicon and Wind River was acquired to help them do that.

 

We fully expect that Wind River will continue to push to maintain and develop their, and now also Virtutech’s, partnerships with other semiconductor/IP vendors.  It should be noted that since Intel’s acquisition of WR back in June, our discussions with other industry participants appear to confirm that WR is making its best effort to evangelize and follow through on its messaging of silicon neutrality. 

 

The greatest factor left undecided at this point, however, might be whether or not all of Virtutech’s partners continue to play (as) nice with a WR/Intel-owned Virtutech over the long term (even if all of their external messaging suggests that).   

 

Whereas on Wednesday we suggested that Synopsys’ acquisition of VaST may create some opportunities for Virtutech and CoWare to capitalize on uncertainty in the market, today’s news potentially reverses the pendulum of market sentiment with perhaps an even greater magnitude.

 

With the potential acquisition targets quickly disappearing, can we expect any new entrants to the VSPS market from other EDA or ESW companies?

 

 

Related Posts:

 

 

~

 

VDC is currently in the process of planning an expansion of our research covering the Lifecyle Management market.  We welcome your input and suggestions to help us refine the scope of this research program.  If you have a few minutes, please click here to provide us with your feed back.

Dell and INTEGRITY Global Security Announce Alliance

Bringing secure solutions to the desktop –

 

What Happened?

 

Dell Inc. (NASDAQ: DELL) announced an alliance with INTEGRITY Global Security  to be the exclusive provider of the INTEGRITY separation kernel for general-purpose secure computing to government agencies.

 

VDC’s View

 

In November 2008 Green Hills Software announced that it had formed INTEGRITY Global Security, LLC (IGS) as a wholly owned subsidiary of Green Hills Software, Inc. The timing of this announcement coincided with another company announcement of having received certification of its INTEGRITY-178B separation kernel to the Common Criteria EAL 6 + / High Robustness. This certification was conducted by the National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP), a joint government initiative governed by the National Security Agency (NSA).

 

From our perspective the IGS spin-off from Green Hills Software represented a first-mover advantage in defining the market opportunity. So to speak - a sole source opportunity – to capitalize on their NIAP certification in defining the market in advance of other market players such as Wind River and LynuxWorks receiving their certifications.

 

The spin-off represented a chance for the company to formally expand beyond its traditional “embedded roots” into critical infrastructure systems and the much larger enterpri$e/de$ktop environments. However, this scenario created challenges for Green Hills Software with respect to their traditional partnerships and alliances around semiconductor, software, CPU boards, hardware debug, and a host of others – all focused on the embedded market.

 

Enter Dell – a well known and respected worldwide provider to business, education and government environments for enterprise and desktop solutions. With the emphasis on commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS), this announcement represents an integrated solution with Dell’s OptiPlex desktop PC’s and IGS’s INTEGRITY separation kernel - the Dell | INTEGRITY Secure Consolidated Client Solution.

 

While the solution is based on the INTEGRITY-178B Separation Kernel that was certified by NIAP to EAL 6+ and High Robustness, the validation and certification was based on a Target of Evaluation (TOE) that included PowerPC architectures. This Dell/IGS solution will include the x86 architecture so we expect that at some point Green Hills Software/INTEGRITY Global Security would submit a package to NIAP under assurance maintenance for evaluation on this architecture (TOE).

 

Military organizations are expected to be first adopters, however, this solution could span to support critical infrastructure systems and networks in areas such as power, energy, communications, transportation, financial services, and ultimately within commercial enterprises – all domains that can be leveraged by Dell with this integrated solution.

 

Both parties bring their strengths to the alliance – commodity product integration, end-to-end solutions, service, support, market reach, and of course an integrated secure separation kernel. The big leap will be whether private enterprises will agree that this is a solution to meet their needs and that the timing is right.

 

Related Articles:

02/04/2010

Partnership Underscores Integration & Consolidation Trends in Embedded

 

What Happened?

 

In case you missed it, LDRA announced yesterday that it has partnered with Visure Solutions to create an ALM solution specifically targeted at safety-critical embedded applications.

 

 

VDC’s View

 

The heterogeneity of embedded projects had previously insulated, or at least dampered, some of the pressures facing tool companies competing in the embedded world as compared to those in the enterprise/IT market. 

 

The complex and unique development requirements typical in the embedded market fostered a commercial tool market in which best-of-breed or point solutions could still garner the lion’s share of market revenue.  However, times are changing.

 

It is clear that embedded market participants are feeling the pressure to expand their products suites and service offerings in order to meet the demands of engineering teams who are under pressure to do more – in less time, with less help, and with tighter budgets.  Meanwhile, we have seen one of the stalwarts of the enterprise/IT space (and previously embedded), IBM Rational, refocus on embedded with the acquisition of Telelogic (/I-Logix) – further expanding its already broad set of tools.

 

The recent acquisitions undertaken by Artisan Software (Atego) and yesterday by Synopsys further underscore this self-reinforcing trend as companies look to augment their value proposition and improve the abilities to address the needs of customers in new segments.

 

 

Related Posts:

 

 

~

 

VDC is currently in the process of planning an expansion of our research covering the Lifecyle Management market.  We welcome your input and suggestions to help us refine the scope of this research program.  If you have a few minutes, please click here to provide us with your feed back.

02/03/2010

Synopsys Acquires VaST, becoming #1 in VSPS Market

What Happened?

 

Synopsys(NASDAQ: SNPS) announced that it acquired VaST Systems Technology Corporation.  The terms of the acquisition, which closed February 1st, were not disclosed.

 

VDC’s View

 

A report that we coincidentally released this morning, Virtual System Prototyping/Simulation Tools for Software Development & Verification – A Market Update, shows that a combined Synopsys-VaST would garner the leading share of revenue in the virtual platform market. 

 

Our research also appears to confirm Sysnopsys’ claim that the acquisition of VaST provides them with access to industries, namely automotive, where there was little overlap with the existing revenue streams of Synopsys’ Innovator product line.  Much of this difference had been driven by the functionality of the two companies’ solutions - Synopsys’ Innovater which provides faster simulation, better suited for the mobile market; and Vast’s METeor/CoMET which provides more cycle accurate simulation, which is more attractive to safety-critical markets such as automotive.

 

The factor that holds the most potential in affecting the future of the VSPS market  is whether Synopsys can maintain and/or expand the customer accounts and relationships that they are inheriting from VaST.  In the mean time, we are sure that Virtutech and especially CoWare are looking to capitalize on any uncertainty in the market.

 

VDC intends to comment further on this acquisition, so stay tuned…

 

 

Related Articles:

01/28/2010

The iPad, the iPhone, & the iFans

Driving the evolution of the mobile and embedded software engineering landscape

 

What happened?

 

On January 27th, Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) finally announced its not-so-secret new e-reader/netbook/tablet mobile device.  With all speculation about its name, price, and features now at rest, more questions about the iPad’s potential impact on the mobile and embedded software landscape have begun to rise to the surface.

 

VDC’s View

 

There is no doubt that the iPod helped revolutionize the way people buy, store, and listen to music.  Nor could there be much contesting that the iPhone/iPod touch further catalyzed the transformation of the ways that people interact with multimedia.  But arguably the most transcending effect of Apple’s successful innovation/marketing has been on consumers’ expectations for sophisticated and intuitive user interfaces and for their devices to provide them with highly customizable user experience.

 

Beyond the effects on the music business alone, the iPhone has helped stimulate the rapid expansion of third-party application markets.  Although the ultimate appetite of consumers for yet another device is yet to be determined, the iPad already has what WinMo, Symbian, Android, Amazon, and HP (just to name a few) could only dream of – over 140,000 compatible applications and the iFans, a sea of devoted evangelists, fans, and developers.

 

If the iPad is a commercial success, we expect that the iFans’ expectations for top-tier functionality and ubiquitous, real-time content will drive a greater formalization of the third-party application engineering community – especially given the iPad’s form factor, which opens the door for new applications classes and higher app price points.  Moonlighters and cowboy coders will certainly continue to contribute to the breadth of content and applications accessible, but we expect more, large institutional engineering organizations and ISVs to fuel the next generation of sophisticated apps that will raise the bar once again for the consumer experience.

 

Enter the Embedded/Mobile OS Market Players

 

The evolution of third-party application markets along with the growing adoption of non-proprietary, open source, and consortia-based operating systems have continued to squeeze the traditional value proposition offered by traditional OS vendors attempting to compete in consumer-oriented verticals.  We have already seen a number of these OS vendors race to strengthen their professional service networks and quick-start integration capabilities. 

 

As more OEMs and ISVs attempt to tap into the mobile application market’s power to create new revenue opportunities and/or to strengthen/maintain their brands with the next generation of consumers, application OS vendors just might find their salvation through the functional expertise that once built up a billion dollar market for commercial mobile OSs.

 

Related Posts:

 

01/20/2010

Embedded Market Consolidation Continues

A Q&A with Atego and VDC’s Analysis

 

 

What Happened?

 

Artisan Software Tools and Aonix announced today that they have merged to form a new company, Atego.

 

This move marks the third round of M&A activity for Artisan software over the past three months, and the fifth over the past two years.

 

After having been pre-briefed on the news, VDC conducted a follow-up Q&A with James Gambrell, the former CEO of Artisan who was appointed Executive Chairman of Atego, to discuss his view on the impact of this announcement for both companies as well as the embedded market in general.  In previous management roles, Mr. Gambrell has taken companies from 15 to 750 staff and from $1.7 to $55 million.

 

 

VDC’s Interview

 

VDC: With both the Artisan and Aonix brands already well established within the real-time and embedded markets, why have you created a third company name?  Can we expect Atego to maintain both the Artisan and Aonix brands and product names going forward?

 

Gambrell: “Artisan embarked on a market consolidation program two years ago and this is the fifth merger, but not the last.  As a platform for further market consolidation, we wanted a new name that would recognize both Artisan’s roots and those of Aonix while allowing us to expand outside our historical product and market boundaries.  Both brands will continue as part of product groups built around the existing product sets so that the heritage of our product names will continue into the future.  We remain fully committed to our current and future customers.  Our consolidation plan expressly avoided product overlaps, so that we can be very clear about our commitment to the full suite of Atego products.”

 

VDC: Aonix previously had its own modeling tool offerings (Software through Pictures and Ameos) as well as a set different set of modeling solutions with its roots at SELECT Software Tools (not to be confused with Artisan Studio).  What will make this marriage of tool suites and design methodologies more harmonious and successful than Aonix’s previous endeavors?

 

Gambrell:  “While very powerful, the Aonix StP and Ameos modeling tools both endured as long as possible, with their legacy modeling notations.  The Select modeling business was not part of the Aonix management buyout.  As a result, this left Aonix with sales staff experienced in selling Ada, Java and modeling tools.  This merger has filled the modeling gap for these sales people, capitalizing on their multiple skills.  We expect to capitalize on this ready trained sales force. Additionally, we have already identified a number of opportunities to more closely align the technical capabilities of each other’s tools to work together to provide increased value to our customers in way that older modeling tools could not.”

 

VDC: In recent years, Aonix has invested heavily in the development and promotion of the use of Java in real-time embedded applications.  Will you continue this focus for the Aonix business?  If so, what are your long-term plans for the ObjectAda Development Solutions, which by VDC’s estimates still represents over 40% of Aonix’s revenue?

 

Gambrell:  “Yes, we will continue to push the Aonix Java solutions.  While the real-time Java market has been a little slow to take off, we firmly believe its early success will ensure the future is bright for Java for real time systems.  Because we have a large base of Ada developers from both companies, we believe the Ada market will continue to hold up much better than one might have anticipated – so our long-term plans are to continue to invest in and expand the use of Ada related capabilities, including ObjectAda and other Ada tools in our portfolio.”

 

VDC: We expect that there is the most potential for current client overlap between Artisan and Aonix within the military/aerospace vertical market, which has historically driven the majority of both companies’ revenue.  Are there any other industries in particular that you expect the combined entity to hold the most potential for revenue growth as compared to that of the two independent businesses?

 

Gambrell: “It is true that the Military, Aerospace and Defense markets have been very important for both Aonix and Artisan, which in the short term will allow us to cross sell our solutions to each other’s customers. In the longer term, however, we have been taking action to enlarge our scope across other verticals.  Another area of focus is Rail, Automotive and Transport. In addition to the success we have been having in rail, our recent acquisition of Extessy in Germany has dramatically boosted our penetration into the automotive market.  In parallel, we are also building out our sales into Infrastructure, Communications and Energy especially in satellites and nuclear energy and longer term have been developing our practice in Automation, Industrial & Medical. We remain committed to our core markets which in fact cut across all of these areas:  Mission & Safety Critical software-intensive systems development. 

 

VDC:  Aonix’s business has traditionally been more weighted toward the US than that of Artisan.  Do you expect this merger to help the Artisan product line expand its US business as a result?  If so, how do you expect this merger to augment Artisan’s value proposition and enable Atego to win additional business in a regional market long-dominated by IBM Rational (and its acquirees, Telelogic and I-Logix)?

 

Gambrell:  “Absolutely, we do.  The geographic footprint of both organizations is highly complementary.  As well as significant operations in the UK, France, Italy and Germany, Atego now has a considerable presence in the US.  We have been successful for years competing in the US and are already winning business from competitors and expect to see this accelerate with substantially more scale now focused in the US. Atego is clearly a force to be reckoned with in the US, now more than ever.”

 

VDC:  In the press release, you characterized the merger as “the catalyst for future market consolidation.”  Can you please elaborate on why and how you expect this announcement to generate this kind of a reaction?

 

Gambrell:  “We developed a strategy to drive the next wave of consolidation in our market to deliver an ever increasing value proposition to our customers.   With this significant merger and name change, we are now in a stronger position to accelerate our consolidation plans.  Our scale now allows us to take on larger merger and acquisition targets.  We have also shown that we can successfully merge internationally distributed organizations, rationalize business processes and achieve economies of scale.  We have learnt the lessons required to successful replicate acquisitions on a larger scale. ”

 

VDC:  Aside from the potential for further market consolidation, what are the major trends you see affecting the embedded market in 2010 and how is Atego positioning itself to capitalize on them?

 

Gambrell:  “Our market place is dominated by hugely inefficient development practices and highly fragmented technical capabilities – so we see the current market needs for simplified tool chains and productivity improvements being held back by an aging workforce who must find ways to pass on the hard won institutional knowledge.  Taking lessons learned from one industry and applying them in a lower risk environment requires the merging of best practices from many parallel domains.  Mechanical engineering is bringing ideas like ‘product lines’ while software engineering best practices of component and service based development but considered in a new light. Also learning from the adoption of ERP - which saw a set of tightly integrated applications with a common database dramatically improve corporate supply chains, but unfortunately adoption had a painfully high cost requiring companies to radically alter their operating practices to those allowed by the ERP application. Atego learned the lessons and is delivering an integrated tool chain characterized by a set of loosely coupled applications with a common meta-database which support a company’s existing process & methodology – including working natively in the customer’s tool of choice – even when it’s not one supplied by Atego.”

 

VDC:  In another recent announcement, Artisan announced a solution focused UML/SysML-based hardware/software co-design from the EU’s FP7 SATURN project.  In your opinion, what are the key differences in this technology/methodology that can enable it succeed when many leading EDA companies (unsuccessfully) attempted to promote the hardware/software co-design concept through their own Electronic System Level (ESL) tool offerings a few years ago?

 

Gambrell:  “The need has always existed and now the technology has grown up. Projects like SATURN learn from mistakes of the past, one of which is the use of industry standards.  We are working with partners on these projects that have truly innovative technologies.  Fusing them with market proven modeling tools such as Artisan Studio and the established and emerging OMG standards of SysML and MARTE gives us a much better platform on which to advance.  Our domain experts, proven tools and established industry standards give us a better starting point.”

 

 

VDC’s View

 

This announcement comes on the heels of a number of other recent M&A deals that have altered the embedded marketplace over recent months such as Cavium’s acquisition of MontaVista, IBM’s acquisition of Ounce Labs, and Intel’s acquisition of Wind River.  

 

These as well as Aritisan’s previous acquisitions have highlighted a couple key trends emerging out of the recent recession:

 

  • It is a buyer’s market where companies can be acquired at a substantial discount as compared to the multiples garnered earlier in the ‘00s.
  • The growth in embedded system complexity did not suffer the same set backs as our GDP, nor did embedded engineers’ desire/need to do more with less (not to mention faster).

 

This announcement, however, still leaves a number of lingering questions:

 

  • How well will the integration of tools and design methodologies generate revenue growth within the companies’ existing accounts as well as generate net new opportunities?
  • How will customers – both current and prospect – react?  Will they see Atego’s expansion strategy as providing them with additional flexibility and enhancements to their solutions or as potentially detracting from the development of their core products?
  • With Atego now representing an amalgamation of small companies, will the drastic change in size present any challenges to the established corporate cultures and, ultimately, the success and productivity of the various product groups spread across the globe?

 

Despite these unanswered questions, this large merger has not seemed to quench or peter Artisan/Atego’s thirst to obtain a position of leadership within the broader embedded market.  Mr. Gambrells’ statement pitting the merger as a catalyst for further M&A activity, underscores his view – as well as that of VDC – that engineering teams are increasingly looking for a level of inter-tool integration and communication that can offer a means to address the increasing system complexity while reducing development time (and cost).

 

However, only time will tell if Atego’s growth aspirations will lead them on a path to become an embedded ALM market titan or if their rapid expansion will turn into something closer to an Icarian ascent.

 

 

See our post after Artisan’s acquisition of EXTESSY this fall:

Artisan Acts Rational, Acquiring Companies to Broaden Solution Set

01/18/2010

Embedded Bits and Bytes – In case you missed these announcements from the last week or so.

Microsoft Brings Rich, Connected Experiences to Digital Signage Market

GoAhead Software acquires S3’s embeddedMIND Business

Black Duck Software Growth Surges in 2009, Closes Year with Substantial Gains

UK’s Defence Science and Technology Laboratory chooses Artisan Studio

Enea Optima - Eclipse System Debug, Profiling and Development Tools for the OSE RTOS

Green Hills Software Joins ARM Solution Center for Android

Wind River VxWorks 6.8 Broadens Multicore Capabilities and Processor Support

Klocwork Closes Successful 2009

Synopsys Speeds Timing Signoff by 2X With Latest Multicore Technology

Intel Fourth-Quarter Net Income $2.3 billion, Up 875%

NRF: Intel Unveils Digital Signage Concept

CES: Intel, Industry Partners Unveil App Store Plans for Popular Netbook Computers

Open Kernel Labs Enhances ARM Solution Center for Android with OK:Android

Cavium Networks Schedules Fourth Quarter 2009 Conference Call for January 28, 2010

 

VDC Research looks forward to companies contacting us for a briefing on new announcements around products, new partnerships and alliances, or other changes within your organizations. At a minimum please make sure that we are included in your press/analyst relations distribution list for new announcements as they become public.

 

Telephone: 508.653.9000.

 

Steve Balacco, Director, sbalacco@vdcresearch.com, x124

Chris Rommel, Analyst, crommel@vdcresearch.com, x123

Jared Weiner, Analyst, jweiner@vdcresearch.com, x143

01/12/2010

Outsourcing in the Embedded Market

OEMs turn to third-party engineering services for a variety of reasons.

A recently published industry brief by VDC Research examines OEMs’ use of third-party outsourcing for various embedded software engineering services including its benefits, drivers, inhibitors, and competitive landscape. The industry brief also includes various statistics around the use of outsourcing within embedded engineering development projects.

Engineering Tasks Most Frequently Outsourced to External Companies

(Ranked by Percent of Respondents)

Not outsourcing any engineering tasks

53%

Software application/middleware development/test

1

Board level engineering test

2

Firmware development/test

3

Mechanical engineering

4

System integration/test/verification

5

Outsourcing in embedded software development is driven by OEMs seeking decreased costs and/or improved product quality and by vendors supplying the market with complex, customized combinations of services. Today’s embedded products have become increasingly sophisticated and software development comprises a growing proportion of the product development lifecycle, leading many OEMs to turn to outsourcing to leverage the experience and efficiencies of third-party providers.


Outsourcing vendors that compete in the embedded software space are located throughout the world and include large multi-national companies as well as smaller, boutique firms that focus on specific geographies and/or vertical markets. These vendors seek to differentiate themselves by leveraging alliances, partnerships, acquisitions, and/or experience. They also look to emphasize the talent and global reach of their engineering work force as well as the completeness and flexibility of their service offerings and pricing models.


VDC examines outsourcing in greater depth in the recently published Third-Party Outsourcing of Embedded Software Development Services – An Industry Brief. The brief also includes profiles of several competing vendors as well as an examination of how OEMs should approach the outsourcing decision and what vendors should consider when positioning their service offerings. To view a complimentary executive brief highlighting additional findings from the report, click here.

01/06/2010

Total Market for Embedded Software Engineering Down in 2009 after a 4% Increase in 2008

 

VDC recently released a series of reports from Track 3: The Total Market for Embedded Software Engineering (TMESE) of VDC’s 2009 Embedded Software Market Intelligence Program. These reports include a total available market (TAM) analysis of OEM spending on embedded software engineering (including commercial products and software engineering labor spend).

 

Although growth slowed in the fourth quarter of 2008, many engineering organizations maintained their research and development spending rates throughout the majority of 2008.  The changing economic climate led to a more cautious development approach; whereas engineering staffs would have previously made more of the software purchasing decisions themselves, procurement has become more process-oriented and controlled by higher levels in the organizations.

 

The recession’s impact, however, became even more tangible in early 2009 as many OEMs began making significant cuts to their R+D budgets and engineering staffs as the potential magnitude and duration of the recession became more apparent.  With the total spend on embedded software engineering labor representing the vast majority of the overall TMESE as compared to expenditures on commercial embedded software solutions, the onset of project start delays and cancellations in 2008 had a significant effect on TMESE Labor spend in 2009 and will continue to impact overall embedded software market expenditures in 2010.

 

VDC explores the various trends impacting the Total Market for Embedded Software Engineering in greater depth within these four recently released reports:

 

  Volume 1: Global Embedded Software Engineer Census

§ Includes the global population of embedded engineers by type as well as segmentations of the total embedded engineer and embedded software engineer populations by region and by vertical market.

  Volume 2: Total Market for Embedded Software Engineering – Labor

§ Includes the total embedded engineering labor spend by Embedded Systems Manufacturers segmented by region and by vertical market.

  Volume 3: Total Market for Embedded Software Engineering – Commercial Products

§ Includes the total commercial products spend by Embedded Systems Manufacturers segmented by region and by vertical market.

  Volume 4: Total Market for Embedded Software Engineering – Aggregate

§ Includes the total aggregated spend by Embedded Systems Manufacturers on labor and commercial products segmented by region and by vertical market.

 

 All four volumes from the Track also include selected highlights from VDC’s Embedded System Engineering Survey Data as well as qualitative analysis of key trends affecting the topic under study in 2008, 2009, and beyond.

01/05/2010

Nexus One Google Another Battle in the Mobile OS Wars

The long-awaited announcement from Google was released today for the Android-based Nexus One smartphone (the first in a series of products to be released by Google) or what Google refers to as an emerging class of “superphones.”  The phone is initially selling through Google’s web store at a subsidized price of $179 with T-Mobile service, or for $529 unlocked.

 

Before we talk about what the Nexus One Does represent to the mobile and embedded community, let’s talk about what it Does Not.

 

Nexus One Does Not:

 

  • Represent the long-anticipate “iPhone killer”.   With a feature set that is unarguable nice but by no means earth-shattering, the Nexus One represents just another potential substitute for Apple’s offering and, if nothing else, provides further validation of the achievements Apple’s iPhone made when it was first introduced into the market.
  • Force feed users advertising as a means to further subsidize cost.
  • Fundamentally alter mobile phone purchasing behavior – How many of you people are actually willing to buy the phone for $529?  My guess is that a lot of consumers will wait until it comes out at subsidized prices with other carriers in the spring.

 

 

What Nexus One Does:

 

  • Provide further proof of the potential success and subsequent proliferation of an embedded Linux derivation (Android) within consumer facing applications.
  • Represent another example of software functionality and brand promoted to the forefront of product marketing and consumer decision making.
  • Raise (yet another) red flag in Redmond.  
    • With Windows Mobile (phone?) already in a tailspin, Microsoft is watching its biggest mobile supporter, HTC, come to market with another new Android device.  
    • Should Microsoft look to take another step away from its high per unit royalties in mobile?  If so, what type of pricing pressure could that subsequently cause in the rest of the device classes in which it competes.
  • Perhaps drive the once unassailable leader in the smartphone OS market, Symbian, further behind in this rapidly evolving market.
    • In its current state, Symbian Foundation just does not appear to have the resources available to effectively market Symbian OS and attract third-party application developers – let alone play catch-up within the US where RIM, Apple, and now OHA already have established themselves and saturated consumers with incessant marketing campaigns.
  • Place further emphasis on software and tools vendors’ ability to offer OEMs premium development tools and experienced professional service organizations that can allow OEMs to quickly adapt their legacy software to new platforms and get their product to market as quickly as possible.

 

 

Stayed tuned as VDC looks to comment further on this announcement and other Mobile Operating System market trends here in our blog and in our upcoming report, Volume 3: Mobile Operating Systems from our 2010 Embedded Software and Tools Market Intelligence Service.

 

 

Related Posts:

 

 

Recent Posts

Further Shakeup in the VSPS Market – Intel acquiring Virtutech

Dell and INTEGRITY Global Security Announce Alliance

Partnership Underscores Integration & Consolidation Trends in Embedded

Synopsys Acquires VaST, becoming #1 in VSPS Market

The iPad, the iPhone, & the iFans

Embedded Market Consolidation Continues

Embedded Bits and Bytes – In case you missed these announcements from the last week or so.

Outsourcing in the Embedded Market

Total Market for Embedded Software Engineering Down in 2009 after a 4% Increase in 2008

Nexus One Google Another Battle in the Mobile OS Wars