The point of decision. In retail, it used to be the moment, on the retail floor, when the customer made their final commitment to buy, or to move on. It was at an aisle header, at a display, in the dressing room, at the check out counter. Often with an associate. Just as often without.
During the past decade, the point of decision migrated from the retail floor to create a diaspora-like pattern of decision points. E-tailing produced nothing short of a seismic shift in b-to-c theory, strategy, reality. That story has been well documented … perhaps a thousand times. Retailers saw their web sites as a new point of decision equal to their centuries old, newly coined ‘bricks and mortar’ stores.
When consumers ‘returned’ to bricks and mortar, their expectations changed. They required more accurate information, in real time. They wanted to know what their options were. They had questions about how much customization was available to them. They demanded alternative payment terms and delivery options. Consumers learned a lot on the web. And they came into stores armed, and for the wrong retailer, dangerous. For retailers prepared for this, these informed consumers became better customers.
Prepared retailers shared a number of common attributes – if not a thousand different tactics. One of the most powerful, common attributes, was the deft deployment of self-service solutions. These new internet age consumers – armed with so much real-time, accurate information were conditioned to help themselves. Especially after frustrating experiences with over-matched associates. The right kiosk implementation represented the bridge between consumers online and in-store experiences.
And then, faster, cheaper network connections. And wireless. And the point of decision splintered into billions of intersections of space and time and location. At home on the phone. On PCs at home or at work. Cell phones in the car. PDAs on the street. The point of decision was wherever the consumer was.
Retailers were learning this … some early, others late. Most with a fair amount of pain. And then … the recession. And every single retailer, except Wal-Mart, bled. Some profusely. Others to death.
Consumers went into hiding. And when they returned – as they return – there are fewer. They have less disposable cash. Less credit. And yet, they still have extremely high expectations. They have even more access to information. They have more options. They have more leverage.
The best retailers see this. They see the technical, financial and cultural changesthat have arrived them at a place where they no longer have leverage at the point of decision. Retailers do not want to regain point of decision leverage. They need to. It is not a matter of margin. It is a matter of survival. And as b-to-c relations sort themselves out in this post-recession era, the smartest retailers are looking at strategies that synthesize the best elements of their traditional and information age operations. Some early success strategies involve the deployment of a wider range of next generation retail automation solutions. Think: self service solutions, interactive displays and digital signage or item-level inventory tracking solutions. The objectives of these investments are many-fold – cost reduction, customer experience enhancement, revenue generation.
However, retailers managing the most successful implementations are realizing that, perhaps the most powerful ROI lever is how these technologies are enabling the redeployment of a better trained, albeit smaller, cadre of customer-facing associates. With fewer associate rolls, powerful ROI is accruing to retailers who deploy solutions aimed at freeing associates from non-customer-facing tasks such asinventory management, receiving, replenishment, supplier management. The freed time is invested in support, merchandising, selling … the entire customer experience.
The goal is to re-establish more leverage at the point(s) of decision on the retail floor, and perhaps, with exceptional execution, deliver an unforgettable in-store experience that can exert influence on all the ever-expanding point(s)-of-decision diaspora. Retailers may never be able to exert as much control over the point-of-decision as they did 30 years ago -- even 10 years ago. But with the right technical investments, and sharper retraining and reapplication of their associates, they might have a chance to enhance their influence in the ever-broadening definition of the point-of-decision.
Recent Comments